Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 16:50
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Would you date a Muslim guy? Why/why not?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Why stablecoin play Circle’s stock is still a buy even after a sixfold rally - MarketWatch
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Buzz Williams on what Maryland's playing style will be, learning the Big Ten and more - 247Sports
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Scientists stunned to observe that humpback whales might be trying to talk to us - ZME Science
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
What’s next?
Let’s just make it real clear:
George Clooney Reveals His Wife Amal’s Reaction When He Came Home With His New Hair - HuffPost
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Thank you.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Bats don't get cancer, now scientists think they know the reason - Earth.com
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.